Adenocarcinoma of the Urachus: Case Report

Authors

  • Samuel Bastos Departamento de Urologia, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-9636
  • Vítor Oliveira Departamento de Urologia, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, Portugal
  • Ana Sabença Departamento de Urologia, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, PortugalDepartamento de Urologia, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, Portugal
  • Rui Maciel Departamento de Urologia, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, Portugal
  • Débora Araújo Departamento de Urologia, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, Portugal
  • Rui Amorim Departamento de Urologia, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, Portugal
  • Luís Xambre Departamento de Urologia, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Gaia, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.245

Keywords:

Adenocarcinoma, Urachus, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Abstract

Urachal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy, accounting for approximately one-third of all bladder adenocarcinomas, about 0.01% of all adult tumors, and 0.5% to 2% of all bladder neoplasms.
We present the case of a 70-year-old male referred for evaluation due to hematuria and mucosuria with a two-month evolution.
Imaging studies revealed a nodular lesion at the bladder dome, suggestive of urachal pathology. Urethrocystoscopy identified an exophytic lesion, and biopsy via transurethral resection confirmed the diagnosis of urachal adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent laparoscopic partial cystectomy with en bloc resection of the urachus and umbilicus, combined with bilateral iliac-obturator lymphadenectomy, without complications. Histopathological analysis confirmed a well-differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma (pT2bN0M0) with negative surgical margins, no umbilical involvement, and no lymph node metastasis. The patient remains under regular clinical and imaging surveillance, including cystoscopy and thoracoabdominopelvic computed tomography scans, with no evidence of recurrence to date.
Although rare, urachal adenocarcinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of bladder dome lesions associated with hematuria. Partial cystectomy with concurrent urachal excision and lymphadenectomy represents an effective treatment approach in selected patients. Decisions regarding adjuvant therapy should be individualized. Postoperative surveillance is essential to detect early recurrences and manage residual urinary symptoms, contributing to improved quality of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wein AJ. Campbell-Walsh-Wein: Urology. 12th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020.

Bao B, Hatem M, Wong JK. Urachal adenocarcinoma: a rare case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2017;12:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2016.10.019.

World Health Organization. Tumors classification – Urachal Carcinoma 2022. Geneve: WHO; 2022.

Sheldon CA, Clayman RV, Gonzalez R, Williams RD, Fraley EE. Malignant urachal lesions. J Urol. 1984;131:1-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50167-6.

Hamilou Z, North S, Canil C, Wood L, Hotte S, Sridhar SS,et a. Management of urachal cancer: A consensus statement by the Canadian Urological Association and Genitourinary Medical Oncologists of Canada. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14:E57-E64. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5946

Siefker-Radtke A. Urachal adenocarcinoma: a clinician’s guide for treatment. Semin Oncol. 2012;39:619–24. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2012.08.011

Ashley RA, Inman BA, Sebo TJ, Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Kwon ED, Zincke H. Urachal carcinoma: clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of an aggressive malignancy. Cancer. 2006;107: 712-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22060.

Lerner SP. Non-urothelial bladder cancer. UpToDate. [accessed Jan 2023] Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/non-urothelial-bladder-cancer

National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Version 5. New York: NCCN; 2024.

Published

2025-07-21

Issue

Section

Case Report